REPORT OF THE ECOFUND OPERATION
IN 2001

 

Warsaw, May 2002

The EcoFund Foundation

EcoFund was called into being in 1992 by the Minister of Finance in the form of a foundation to manage the funds derived from a mechanism referred to as “debt-for-environment swap,” i.e. the conversion of a part of the foreign debt of Poland into funds assigned for supporting environmental protection projects. At present, the function of the Founding Organ is fulfilled by the Minister of the State Treasury.

Pursuant to the agreement signed by Poland in 1991 with the creditor countries making a group referred to as the “Paris Club,” a half of the debt has been remitted and the other half is to be paid back by Poland by 2010. A part of that paid-back money is now transferred to the EcoFund’s bank account.

So far, the following six creditor countries decided to join the Polish debt-for-environment-swap scheme:

The USA (decision taken in 1991) USD 370 million

France (1993) USD 66 million

Switzerland (1993) USD 63 million

Sweden (1997, 1999) USD 13 million

Italy (1998) USD 32 million

Norway (2000) USD 27 million

Total USD 571 million

The funds received within that mechanism are allocated by EcoFund for providing financial support (in the form of grants and/or loans) for projects undertaken in the following five areas recognized to be of priority importance:

  1. Reduction of the transboundary transport of SO2 and NOx and elimination of the low sources of such emissions;
  2. Restoration of water cleanliness in the Baltic Sea and protection of drinking water resources;
  3. Reduction of the emissions of gases that cause global climate changes (CO2, methane, freons);
  4. Biological diversity protection;
  5. Rationalization of waste management and reclamation of soils.

The investment projects classified within those sectors are supported by EcoFund only at the project implementation stage. This means that the Foundation does not provide financial aid for the preparation of project documentation, research work, monitoring surveys, or ecological education projects.

A specific feature of EcoFund, which differentiates the Foundation from other institutions supporting environmental protection activities in Poland, is the EcoFund’s policy to facilitate the transfer of the best foreign technologies to Poland from the donor countries by way of concentrating the financial aid on purchasing the basic parts of project installations from manufacturers of those countries. This is beneficial both for Poland and the donor countries because, on the one hand, the efficiency and reliability of project installations is thus improved and, on the other hand, manufacturers of the donor countries are thus promoted on the Polish market.

 

 

List of Contents

 

1. Introduction

2. Year 2001 vs Previous EcoFund Activities 

2.1 EcoFund’s Revenues

2.2 EcoFund’s Expenses Incurred for Financing Projects in 1992 ÷ 2001

3. EcoFund Projects in 2001 

3.1 Forms of Activity

3.2 Project Selection

3.3 Project Implementation

3.4 Material Effects and Environmental Benefits 

3.5 Technology Transfer

4. Recapitulation

  1. Introduction
  2. In 2001, which was the ninth full year of EcoFund’s operation, many changes took place that were of major importance for the functioning of the Foundation. First of all, the EcoFund Council and the Founding Organ approved modifications to the EcoFund Statutes according to which EcoFund may now not only award grants but also offer preferential loans. This means that, in the perspective of several years, the funds being at EcoFund’s disposal and intended for supporting environmental protection activities will significantly increase. In consequence, the number of projects possible to be financed with EcoFund’s support will rise as well.

    Last year, the total grants awarded by EcoFund exceeded for the first time a threshold of PLN 150 million and EcoFund handled 207 projects being at various implementation stages.

    The number of contracts concluded with manufacturers of the donor-countries and paid from the EcoFund financial aid money increased to a level many times as high as that of the recent years. This indicates an increased share of equipment and technologies purchased from the countries taking part in the debt-for-environment-swap scheme in the environmental protection projects implemented in Poland. That increase is an effect of consistent EcoFund’s promotion activities and is beneficial for both the donor countries and Poland.

    The year 2001 was also exceptional in respect of the number and nature of projects completed due to the EcoFund’s contribution to recovering from the effects of the disastrous flood that took place in Poland in July 2001. The Foundation allocated over PLN 18 million for flood damage repair projects carried out in the Lubelskie, Małopolskie, Pomorskie, and Świętokrzyskie Voivodeships. To restore the operation of the most important parts of the infrastructure as quickly as possible, a decision was taken that EcoFund might have the right in that case to finance selected projects even in 100%. This was emergency help provided for communes and business units whose financial capabilities were in many cases far lower than the costs of repairing all the damage caused by the flood. That money was assigned for repair work carried out at drinking water intake stations, water supply and sewerage networks, and central heating boiler plants. It is worth stressing here that all those projects were completed before the end of 2001.

  3. Year 2001 vs Previous EcoFund Activities

    1. EcoFund’s Revenues
    2. In the years 1992 ÷ 2001, EcoFund received about USD 235 million in total from the Polish-debt-for-environment-swap mechanism, i.e. about 40% of the total amount that is to be at EcoFund’s disposal in the years 1992 ÷ 2009. This means that during the next nine years the revenues will regularly increase: EcoFund will receive at least USD 335 million more, i.e. an amount higher by USD 100 million than that received by the Foundation for managing for the first nine years of its operation.

      In 2001, EcoFund received an amount of USD 34 606 000 from the Polish-debt-for-environment-swap scheme, i.e. over USD 3 million more than in 2000.

       

      Fig. 1. EcoFund’s receipts from the Polish-debt-for-environment-swap scheme in the years 1992 to 2001 [USD million]

      In terms of Polish currency, the EcoFund’s receipts from the debt-for-environment-swap scheme reached a level of PLN 144.07 million and a further amount of PLN 18.77 million (equal to 13% of the receipts from debt-for-environment swap) was received from EcoFund’s capital transactions. Hence, the total EcoFund’s revenues in 2001 amounted to PLN 162.6 million and made almost 19% of all the revenues received by the Foundation during the nine years of its operation.

      Fig. 2. Total EcoFund’s receipts in the years 1992 to 2001 [PLN million]

    3. EcoFund’s Expenses Incurred for Financing Projects in 1992 ÷ 2001

    In the years 1992 to 2001, EcoFund spent about PLN 755 million in total as grants awarded to environmental protection projects. The amount disbursed for this purpose in 2001 reached PLN 153.4 million, which makes about 20% of the sum of all the grants awarded by the Foundation hitherto. It happened for the first time that EcoFund assigned more than PLN 150 million in a single year for the implementation of projects. Noteworthy is that the said expenses rose by as much as 50% in comparison with those incurred only two years before, i.e. in 1999!

    Considering the fact that a grant makes, on the average, 15% to 20% of the total project cost, we may estimate that EcoFund participated in projects valued at about PLN 4 ÷ 5 billion in the aggregate. It happened in many cases that relatively small amounts of EcoFund grants stimulated the disbursement of funds being several times as high and made thus possible to implement projects important from the environmental protection point of view.

    Fig. 3. EcoFund’s expenses incurred for subsidizing projects in 1992 to 2001 [PLN million]

    In 2001, a clearly visible change took place in the structure of subsidizing projects of particular priority sectors. Namely, the expenses grew very dynamically for the climate protection sector (sector III) whilst the number of projects financially supported by EcoFund and implemented in the air protection sector (sector I) significantly dropped. The growth of the importance attached to the climate protection sector chiefly results from the multiannual persistent EcoFund’s endeavors aimed at the promotion of projects related to the use of renewable energy sources. An amount of as much as PLN 51 million, i.e. almost 1/3 of all the expenses incurred by EcoFund, was assigned for the implementation of projects related to the use of biomass (straw, wood), wind, or solar radiation for energy generation purposes.

    Table 1. Sums of the grants paid by EcoFund in 2001, by sectors

    Sector

    Grants paid

     

    PLN

    %

    1. Air protection

    17 711 400

    11.2

    2. Water protection

    24 105 800

    15.2

    3. Climate protection

    75 785 700

    51.0

    4. Nature protection

    25 371 100

    16.0

    5. Waste management

    10 414 600

    6.6

    TOTAL

    153 388 600

    100.0

    A distinct upward trend can also be seen in the nature protection sector, where an amount of almost PLN 12 million was granted for typical nature-related projects and the remaining amount of PLN 13.6 million was spent for the construction of sewage treatment plants aimed at protecting the cleanliness of water in lakes of particularly high value in terms of nature protection.

    A very small growth can be seen in the waste management sector. The few projects undertaken in this field do not correspond to the needs existing in Poland (in 2001, as little as PLN 10.4 million was disbursed by EcoFund for that purpose). However, the new laws that are to be put into effect, significantly tightening the rigors applicable to the municipal waste management system, are most likely to bring about considerable animation in that sector in the years to come.

    The number of projects implemented within the sector of the protection of water cleanliness in the Baltic Sea is declining from year to year. This is a natural consequence of the actions performed in the previous years. In general, EcoFund paid about PLN 200 million for that purpose, taking part in projects valued at more than PLN 1 billion in total.

    A somewhat less amount (PLN 150 million) was assigned by EcoFund hitherto for carrying out projects within the air protection sector, with a considerable part of that being allocated for making purchases abroad. At present, the share of projects of that sector in the total EcoFund’s expenditure is decreasing due to economic recession and worsening profitability of the energy generation and management industry: the grants disbursed in 2001 for projects of this kind totaled PLN 17.7 million.

     

  4. EcoFund Projects in 2001
    1. Forms of Activity

Apart from the analyses of individual Project Questionnaires and Grant Applications currently carried out by EcoFund specialists as those documents are received, an extremely important part of EcoFund’s activities arises from the policy of active searching for the most valuable and most needed environmental protection undertakings, having been pursued by the Foundation for many years. Such an approach manifests itself in organizing competitions and developing own multiannual programs dedicated to specific subject matters or regions.

In 2001, the following 13 programs dedicated to specific subject matters or regions and aimed at comprehensively solving the most urgent environmental protection problems in Poland were continued:

Another form of the active searching for the best projects on the nation-wide scale is the organizing of competitions. The juries include eminent specialists in the fields relevant to the competitions and objective criteria give equal chances to all the investors who enter their projects for the competitions. In 2001, EcoFund prepared and held six competitions in the fields as follows:

Apart from normal operation, EcoFund also took a quick action in the second half of 2001 to render financial help to the towns and villages that were most severely affected by a flood. In general, 27 projects were awarded grants within that action, with the total amount of the grants exceeding PLN 18 million, which made 62.5% of the costs of rebuilding the water supply, sewerage, and heating systems destroyed by the flood.

                   2.   Project Selection

      EcoFund has always been attaching great importance to the project selection procedures, laying a stress on eliminating any subjective criteria and replacing them with a more objective point-awarding system of project assessment and on shortening the time of Grant Applications waiting for a decision on awarding financial aid to projects. In 2001, the EcoFund Office received 6 200 letters and documents of various kind concerning projects proposed for subsidizing, but only 173 of the Project Questionnaires examined at the first stage of the project assessment procedure were passed to the second stage of that procedure (during which Grant Applications are assessed) and 249 Grant Applications were given positive opinions and accepted for implementation. Last year, grants were awarded to 128 new projects, with the total amount of the grants being PLN 164 519 000. On the average, a single grant covered 26% of the total project costs. Like in the previous years, most of the projects that were given financial aid were related to the nature protection and climate protection sectors (52 and 46 projects, respectively). A comparison between the graphs representing the numbers of projects approved within particular sectors and the amount of financial aid granted within those sectors shows that over 50% of all the money granted in 2001 was allocated for climate protection projects and further 23% was assigned for projects related to nature protection.

       

      Fig. 4. Distribution of EcoFund grants awarded in 2001 among particular priority sectors, by numbers of projects (a) and by amounts allocated (b)

      a. 

      b.

      Priority sectors: 

      1. Air protection

      2. Water protection

      3. Climate protection

      4. Nature protection

      5. Waste management

      In 2001, the predominant beneficiary was the group of communes, which received over 45% of all the grants awarded (PLN 68.6 million). An amount of nearly PLN 62 million was received by business units (inclusive of municipal companies). Organizations financed from the State budget (national parks, landscape parks, forest service units) were subsidized with an amount of PLN 9.95 million in total. The other funds allocated for environmental protection projects consisted of grants awarded to non-governmental ecological organizations and housing cooperatives.

    1. Project Implementation

In 2001, the stock of projects going through different EcoFund project handling stages consisted of 207 environmental protection undertakings (by over 20% more than in 2000) of various size and progress status; 117 of them were completed during that year.

The largest part of the total stock of EcoFund projects consisted of nature protection undertakings (91 projects). They were chiefly aimed at protecting endangered species and their habitats and restoring natural conditions in areas of high natural value. An important line in that activity was dedicated to reducing the discharge of sewage to rivers and lakes in areas of outstanding natural value, i.e. national parks, nature reserves, and landscape parks. The areas where particularly large numbers of water protection projects were undertaken for biodiversity protection reasons were Narew National Park, Biebrza National Park, Great Mazurian Lakes region, and Tuchola Forest.

Like in the previous years, projects aimed at reducing the emissions of gases that cause global climate changes made the second largest group of EcoFund’s projects, in terms of the number of undertakings. In that group, 45 projects were completed and 12 other projects were at the stage of negotiating Grant Agreements. The goal to reduce the emission of gases that cause global climate changes was pursued by changing the type of fuel when modernizing boiler plants (from coal to biomass or gas) as well as by saving energy and raising the efficiency of energy use. Actions continued for several years to promote renewable energy sources bring now increasingly satisfying effects: large funds were allocated in 2001 for projects dedicated to the use of biomass for energy generation purposes and the construction of next wind power plants.

The quantity of waste management projects increases from year to year but the scale of the actions taken in that field is still too small in comparison with the existing needs. Last year, 7 projects aimed at the safe disposal of dangerous wastes and the rationalization of municipal waste management systems were completed. Those projects included putting into service such facilities as municipal waste sorting and processing installations at Koszalin, Słupsk, and Sucha Beskidzka, a modern hospital wastes incineration plant in Białystok, or a system to utilize end liquors at the Chemical Works at Luboń near Poznań.

As few as 6 projects related to reducing the sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions and the transboundary transport of such gases were included in the stock of EcoFund projects in 2001. It should be stressed here, however, that the grants awarded to projects undertaken in that field were much higher than those given to projects of the other sectors. The projects of this kind were set to the application of large-scale modern engineering solutions, such as the construction of a heat and power generating plant fired with waste natural gas at Władysławowo.

Among the projects that were awarded EcoFund grants in 2001, the following deserve particular notice:

Air protection (sector I):

Water protection (sector II):

Climate protection (sector III):

Nature protection (sector IV):

Waste management (sector V):

 

           4.  Material Effects and Environmental Benefits

Projects implemented with using EcoFund’s financial support have been considerably contributing to the improvement of environmental quality in Poland for the recent nine years.

In the field of air protection and climate protection, the environmental benefits achieved are measured, above all, by the reduction of atmospheric emissions of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and dust whilst the actual material effects chiefly consist in the replacement of traditional fuels (e.g. coal or natural gas) with renewable energy sources (straw, chopped wood, heat pumps, or solar collectors). An additional effect is the rationalization of energy consumption accomplished by way of modernization of heating networks and heat distribution centers, automation of the heat generation, transfer, and reception processes, and thermal upgrading of buildings: in 2001, 58 000 m2 of additional heat insulation was applied to buildings in the projects subsidized by EcoFund. Moreover, 24 boiler plants fired with straw and chopped wood of 50 MW total power capacity were put into service with EcoFund’s financial support. At the same time, 105 coal-fired boiler plants of 117 MW total power capacity were eliminated. In addition to that, solar collectors of 735 m2 total area and 520 kW total power capacity and 7 heating systems with heat pumps of 1.6 MW total power capacity were built. Last year, EcoFund also co-financed the construction of two wind power farms of 23 MW total power capacity.

In total, the projects completed in 2001 brought about the abatement of carbon dioxide by almost 180 000 metric tons a year, sulfur dioxide by 57 800 metric tons a year, dust by 12 600 metric tons a year, and nitrogen oxides by 584 metric tons a year.

The material effect achieved in the water protection sector is the increased throughput capacity of new modern sewage treatment plants. Thanks to putting 12 such plants into service, technical capacity was provided for the treatment of about 20 882 m3 of municipal sewage a day with the characteristics of the treated effluents being in conformity with European union requirements. Five new facilities of this kind were built along the Baltic Sea coast and many other plants were put into operation in the interior, where they serve e.g. to protect underground water reservoirs, water intakes for large urban agglomerations, lakes, national parks, or nature reserves. More than 96 km of sanitary collectors were built to feed sewage to treatment plants and, within the action to recover from flood effects, 81 km of water supply networks were built to replace wells where water was contaminated.

The environmental benefits gained from nature-related projects may be described by presenting the scope of the work carried out to restore natural conditions in degraded areas, to protect various animal species, and to protect animal and plant sanctuaries.

Last year, 45 nature-related projects were completed, which included e.g.:

In the waste management sector, the seven projects completed resulted in creating potential for the annual recovery of 4 300 metric tons of scrap paper, 5 370 metric tons of plastics, 3 870 metric tons of glass wastes, and 1 300 metric tons of metals. Moreover, possibilities were provided for the production of 12 000 metric tons of compost and safe disposal of 10 000 metric tons of scrap batteries (which are a dangerous waste) a year.

The removal of gas pitch deposits (500 metric tons) from the Struga Darłowska river helped to protect the Wieprza river and the Baltic coastal waters in the vicinity of Darłowo from contamination.

It is worth pointing out that the material effects and environmental benefits presented here undergo reciprocal enhancement because of the concentration of EcoFund projects in the areas of national parks, health resorts, and towns of high population.

 

                 5.  Technology Transfer

One of EcoFund’s tasks is to facilitate the transfer of the best foreign technologies developed in the donor countries to Poland. In 2001, considerable growth could be seen in the number of contracts concluded with suppliers from those countries: 398 contracts were signed with over 200 companies (to compare with as few as 82 contracts signed in 1999 and 156 contracts signed in 2000). EcoFund’s money was used to make purchases valued at PLN 55.7 million in total, with as much as 99% of that amount (PLN 55.21 million) being spent for equipment manufactured in the donor countries. In addition to that, investors spent about PLN 22 million from their own resources for purchases made in the donor countries. The money obtained from EcoFund and paid to suppliers from those countries made 35.2% of the total amount of EcoFund grants disbursed last year for the implementation of projects.

In 2001, the most successful bidders in the procedures of tendering for contracts in the projects subsidized by EcoFund were Italian companies, which were then followed in this ranking by French, Swedish, and Norwegian suppliers. If the situation is compared with that of the previous years, a considerable drop can be seen in the purchases made from US companies. This can be explained by the fact that those companies take part in large investment projects only, whilst the number of such projects implemented in Poland is now rather small.

Fig. 5. Share of donor-countries in the purchases made abroad and financed from EcoFund grants in 2001 [%]

Like in the previous years, the largest group of imports consisted of technical machinery and equipment bought for large projects carried out in the climate protection and air protection sectors, chiefly gas-fired turbines, wind turbines, technical equipment of heating systems representing various technologies, and energy generation and transfer control systems. In the other sectors, the technology transfer covered machinery and equipment for sewage treatment plants, forest protection chemicals, and facilities for selective waste collection, recycling, and disposal. Those imports complemented the available range of domestic products, which, in general, are good and offered at competitive prices.

Table 2. Technology transfer financed from EcoFund grants in 2001 [PLN]

Country

Sector I

Sector II

Sector III

Sector IV

Sector V

Total

The USA

4 012 196

807 748

721 830

5 541 774

France

735 040

8 785 306

999 020

240 965

10 760 331

Switzerland

135 960

393 789

37 500

567 249

Sweden

670 697

4 261 009

1 342 267

533 041

6 807 014

Italy

13 188 224

722 000

7 440 870

1 357 348

1 240 518

23 948 960

Norway

7 580 211

7 580 211

Total

17 200 420

2 263 697

29 268 933

4 457 965

2 014 524

55 205 539

Others

118 004

419 766

537 770

Grand total

17 200 420

2 263 697

29 386 937

4 877 731

2 014 524

55 743 309

 

 

  1. Recapitulation

The year 2001 was an important year in the EcoFund history. This was not only because of the fact that the first half of the period 1992 ÷ 2010, during which the Foundation manages the funds obtained from the Polish-debt-for-environment-swap scheme, had just passed. The introduction of changes to the EcoFund’s Statutes enabling the Foundation to grant loans will cause that the amounts of money assigned by the Foundation every year for supporting environmental protection undertakings will increase within a few years. Thus, the range of EcoFund’s capabilities has changed and the number of tasks to cope with has changed as well. Simultaneously, the organizational structure of the Foundation was developed to provide the optimum conditions for fulfilling the increased tasks. At present, it is important that EcoFund should be able to pay more attention to conducting promotion activities and imparting its knowledge and experience to as many interested parties as possible.

The number of projects implemented with EcoFund’s support is increasing from year to year, which means further reduction of pollutant emissions to the environment, restoration of natural conditions of degraded ecosystems, protection of valuable plant and animal species, etc. The EcoFund’s revenues and expenses are also increasing.

Based on the trends observed hitherto, we may expect that the number of projects and the funds turned over to applicants will further increase in the years to come, and let us recall that the EcoFund’s operation for the period limited to the 12 months of 2001 may be most briefly described by the following data:

  • 207 projects being at various implementation stages (a growth by 20% as against the figure of 2000);

  • Grants awarded to 128 new projects (a growth by more than 33% as against the figure of 2000);

  • 120 projects completed with all the accounts having been cleared (a growth by 30% as against the figure of 2000);

  • An amount of PLN 153.4 million paid as grants; the threshold of PLN 150 million was exceeded for the first time in the EcoFund’s history;

  • An amount of PLN 55.2 million (about 36% of the total amount spent to support projects) disbursed for purchasing machinery and equipment from the donor countries under 398 contracts signed with more than 200 suppliers;

  • Additional actions taken to provide aid for 18 towns and villages within a quick emergency operation carried out to repair the damage caused by the flood in July 2001;

  • Running 13 multiannual programs dedicated to specific subject matters or regions and organizing 6 nation-wide competitions;

  • Taking part in several dozen conferences held home and abroad, with delivering lectures, and organizing about fifteen educational meetings and training courses at the EcoFund office, related to the competitions organized and programs run.